<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230; is wrong with page-turners?</title>
	<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/</link>
	<description>A working notebook</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/#comment-3399</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:39:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/#comment-3399</guid>
					<description>Nah, not my intent and I'd hoped the post above made it clear that I also take it as the mark of a book I really love if I can’t put it down, though I read a fair amount of books that I love that I have no problem putting down too (like some family who I love dearly but don't want to see all the time). I *do* think that the books I'm talking about have as one of their main good qualities only that they're page turners. The whole point of the post though is that that's an awesome quality in a book. Even a dumb page turner is still a good book, though I do not at all think that a page turner must be dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nah, not my intent and I&#8217;d hoped the post above made it clear that I also take it as the mark of a book I really love if I can’t put it down, though I read a fair amount of books that I love that I have no problem putting down too (like some family who I love dearly but don&#8217;t want to see all the time). I *do* think that the books I&#8217;m talking about have as one of their main good qualities only that they&#8217;re page turners. The whole point of the post though is that that&#8217;s an awesome quality in a book. Even a dumb page turner is still a good book, though I do not at all think that a page turner must be dumb.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jim</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/#comment-3398</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:26:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/#comment-3398</guid>
					<description>I feel like you are using the word &quot;page-turner&quot; as a put-down, like &quot;books that aren't academic or very smart,&quot; even though tons of books that are quicker reads are actually really good books.  i take it as the mark of a book i really love if i can't put it down. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I feel like you are using the word &#8220;page-turner&#8221; as a put-down, like &#8220;books that aren&#8217;t academic or very smart,&#8221; even though tons of books that are quicker reads are actually really good books.  i take it as the mark of a book i really love if i can&#8217;t put it down.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/#comment-3391</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:14:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/#comment-3391</guid>
					<description>That's the word I wanted, yes! Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That&#8217;s the word I wanted, yes! Thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: travis</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/#comment-3390</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:54:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2009/07/03/is-wrong-with-page-turners/#comment-3390</guid>
					<description>mood?  does that word work for what you wanted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>mood?  does that word work for what you wanted?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
