<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230; is alienated militancy?</title>
	<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2008/05/29/is-alienated-militancy/</link>
	<description>A working notebook</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2008/05/29/is-alienated-militancy/#comment-2597</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:20:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2008/05/29/is-alienated-militancy/#comment-2597</guid>
					<description>Yes yes!

I've been considering these things in my own political work recently, it's nice to hear others discussing it. I particularly like Bologna's piece, though the first two really hit me personally right now as relevant.

My question: Kellstadt's formulation of the organic worker-intellectual is interesting, but how useful is it? I wonder if he/she isn't repeating what I see as the strongest weakness of the autonomists, that of placing too much emphasis on the most privileged parts of the working class. Hm, I dunno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes yes!</p>
	<p>I&#8217;ve been considering these things in my own political work recently, it&#8217;s nice to hear others discussing it. I particularly like Bologna&#8217;s piece, though the first two really hit me personally right now as relevant.</p>
	<p>My question: Kellstadt&#8217;s formulation of the organic worker-intellectual is interesting, but how useful is it? I wonder if he/she isn&#8217;t repeating what I see as the strongest weakness of the autonomists, that of placing too much emphasis on the most privileged parts of the working class. Hm, I dunno.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
