February 18, 2008

… is on page 123 of Gender History In Practice?

Filed under: Miscellaneous

I’ve been tagged. Here’s the game:

1. Pick up the nearest book (of at least 123 pages).
2. Open the book to page 123.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the next three sentences.
5. Tag five people.

1. Book = Kathleen Canning, Gender History In Practice

2 -4.

(Page 122 is blank, that would have been interesting. The instructions do not say to post the 5th sentence nor do they say not to. I shall refrain.)

“In Germany, by contrast, the history of work, industrial transformation, and class formation was viewed as exhaustively researched by the late 1980s, so social historians turned to the thus far unexplored Burgertum [should be an umlaut over the first u], thereby closing the book on labor history before it “went cultural” or began to explore gender. On both sides of the Atlantic however, transformations of geopolitics, symbolized in the “fall of the Berlin Wall,” appeared to alter the political resonances of work and workers, shifting attention from struggles of class to those of citizens, civil societies, and governmentality. For a plethora of reasons, some specific to respective national or academic contexts, labor, as a distinct field of inquiry, seemed to vanish from graduate seminars, conference programs, and academic best-seller lists in the course of the 1990s.”

5. Tag five people.
I tag NP at Roughtheory, Wildly at Wildly Parenthetical, Negatron at Unemployed Negativity, Adam at Machete408, and Mike at the STO history blog.

February 17, 2008

… difference does machinery make for law?

Filed under: Miscellaneous

In chapter 15 of v1 of Capital, Marx writes that machinery “revolutionizes, and quite fundamentally (…) the contract between the worker and the capitalist. Taking the exchange of commodities as our basis, our first assumption was that the capitalist and the worker confronted each other as free persons, as independent owners of commodities (….) But now the capitalist buys children and young persons.” (more…)

… took me so long to try yoga?

Filed under: Miscellaneous

Prejudice, straight up stupid old prejudice. (more…)

February 13, 2008

… is the spirit of capital?

Filed under: Miscellaneous

Marx writes in the chapter on the working day that “[n]othing characterizes the spirit of capital better than the history of English factory legislation from 1833 go 1864.” (more…)

February 10, 2008

… did Marx think about industrial accidents?

Filed under: Miscellaneous

I haven’t re-read chapter ten in its entirety and I am, as I mentioned, working under imperfect conditions, but so far from my most recent re-read and what I can recall from before, I think it’s striking that Marx doesn’t mention industrial accidents. (more…)

February 7, 2008

… does Marx mean by free labor?

Filed under: Miscellaneous

Obstacles to blogging continue. For now, briefly, thoughts on a passage from chapter 6 of v1 of Capital (more…)