<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230; is force?</title>
	<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/</link>
	<description>A working notebook</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: todd</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1849</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:39:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1849</guid>
					<description>i'm down with that but marx isn't is he? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i&#8217;m down with that but marx isn&#8217;t is he?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1847</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:30:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1847</guid>
					<description>Nah man it's the other way around: the sectioning off of the economy as nonpolitical was suspect from the start (such that 'political economy' is redundant). After deciding that it's all just a matter of different forces and such, in particular contexts (just should probly be in scare quotes here).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nah man it&#8217;s the other way around: the sectioning off of the economy as nonpolitical was suspect from the start (such that &#8216;political economy&#8217; is redundant). After deciding that it&#8217;s all just a matter of different forces and such, in particular contexts (just should probly be in scare quotes here).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: todd</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1846</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:32:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1846</guid>
					<description>nate say it ain't so! isn't that just crude economism and reducing political categories to economic ones. Tell me I'm missing something and there's more going on there. I'd be happier inverting that relation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>nate say it ain&#8217;t so! isn&#8217;t that just crude economism and reducing political categories to economic ones. Tell me I&#8217;m missing something and there&#8217;s more going on there. I&#8217;d be happier inverting that relation
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spc. Tackle</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1826</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:14:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1826</guid>
					<description>One might also read these remarks in light of Benjamin's provocative (and &quot;messianic&quot;) &quot;Kritik zur Gewalt,&quot; which certainly places force/violence at any birth-scene. . . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One might also read these remarks in light of Benjamin&#8217;s provocative (and &#8220;messianic&#8221;) &#8220;Kritik zur Gewalt,&#8221; which certainly places force/violence at any birth-scene. . .
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1819</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:37:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/07/26/is-force/#comment-1819</guid>
					<description>For comparison, you might want to add the comment about &quot;fetters.&quot; His argument seems to be more to the effect that there is a &quot;potential&quot; of some sort, but a potential that won't be realized without the imposition of force. I'm not sure that potential is correlative to teleology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For comparison, you might want to add the comment about &#8220;fetters.&#8221; His argument seems to be more to the effect that there is a &#8220;potential&#8221; of some sort, but a potential that won&#8217;t be realized without the imposition of force. I&#8217;m not sure that potential is correlative to teleology.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
