April 11, 2007

… is the social justice industry?

Filed under: Gattungswesen

A friend of mine asked me and Matt to speak on a panel at Tent State for students, about life after graduating. The panel’s called “Beyond the Nonprofit Industrial Complex.” What follows is a rough draft written for me to collect my thoughts prior to presenting. Feedback welcome.

I appreciate the invitation to be here today. This kind of thing is always really helpful for me to get clear in my own head, from doing my share of talking and even more from discussion. I’ll try to be brief, so we can get to that, the discussion.

First off, show of hands, how many of you are graduating this spring? next winter? next spring? Okay. Anyone already graduated? Thanks.

I don’t remember when this was, sometime around 2000 or 2001. I remember deciding and telling my partner something along the lines of “we all have to have jobs in this society. Well, I want to get jobs that will develop abilities that might be more useful for the revolution.” Incidentally, I didn’t realize it then but this is a sort of individualized version of an old orthodox marxist view, that capitalism creates new revolutionary potentials in the working class - this is the source of Marx’s view that capitalism creates and trains its own gravediggers, the proletariat. I figured working in nonprofits would give me certain skills, let me make the world a somewhat better place on the clock, and keep the evils of capitalism fresh on my mind all the time so I wouldn’t sell out. I guess I though I should look for jobs that would help me in what I took to be my calling as a gravedigger.

All of that did happen, sort of - though technically since we haven’t had the revolution it’s not clear what is and isn’t useful to the revolution - so in a way my plan worked. At the same time, I could have gotten the same results in another way. My friend M, for instance, has been organizing on the job as a bike messenger for several years now. His skills and class anger are at least as sharp as mine - sharper, really - and he’s made more of a difference than I ever did when I was full time staff.

The other thing is that I didn’t really think this stuff through. I didn’t realize what I was getting into and I didn’t have clarity on what these places were that I’d be working for. I figured before going into these jobs that these places still operated on a capitalist logic, and I was right, but I didn’t fully grasp it. I was still surprised when they just acted like I expected them to, like employers (which is to say, exploiters). I got wrapped up in how these jobs were different. Sure, they were capitalist but they were differently capitalist, I thought, I mean it’s not like they were a regular job, after all I was accomplishing three things at my job, three radical things. That’s what tied me into the job, my belief that the job was different - uniquely different - from all other job types.

To make sense of this, I want to use a distinction drawn I think by Ella Baker, who I just recently read about in great book on her by Barbara Ransby - and who, incidentally, I think would disagree with me here - and who you might be interested in. Baker distinguished between making a living and making a life. The first is how you pay the bills. The second is why you bother. As far as I’m concerned, the first is a major obstacle to the second, and doing something about it - pushing back and eventually eliminating the capitalist class - is one of the most important projects there is. Period.

Here’s a brief story. I’m not religious and my wife’s not religious. My mother-in-law is religious. A few year’s ago my wife found out her mom had been an agnostic for 10 or 15 years or so. She kept wrestling with it because her father - my wife’s grandfather - had been a pastor. She said that she felt like if she didn’t make her religion work then her father’s life and work had been in vain. I have to say, I don’t feel this. On the one hand, I feel like a lot of people’s lives are lived in vain, because we live in a society that steals our lives away. Marx compared capitalism to a vampire, our lives feeds a brutal monster of a social order. And this happens through work, work that’s useless or worse. On the other hand, and this is what my wife said, the value of my wife’s grandfather is not in how he made a living, his job as a pastor, it’s in his life, what he did.

I mention this because one of the reasons some people end up working in the nonprofit industry is that they want to find their day job satisfying and meaningful. That’s understandable. Who doesn’t want a satisfying job, given how much of our lives is spent on the job? But it’s important to make Baker’s distinction, between making a living and making a life. People who end up working in the nonprofit industry don’t just want a decent job, they want their job to make a difference. That is, they want to get paid for doing something really important to the world. That’s also understandable. It’s seductive.

People who try to make a living in the arts want to get paid for doing something they want to do and would do anyway. Art is how some people make their life. Trying to make your living in art means trying to get paid for the thing, the art things, you do in making you life. There’s an aspect of this in the nonprofit industry as well - at least in the so-called social justice portions of the industry - especially if you come from an activist background but it’s not the same. In my experience, the nonprofit world works the other way. Instead of making their living by making their life like people live off the arts, people who work for a long time in the nonprofit industry end up making their life out of making their living. Not unlike people in corporate jobs. The job becomes your life.

Now, you might say, why is that a problem? If the job is making a difference, making the world a better place, then why shouldn’t that be my life? You might say, I want my life to be making a difference, I will make my life by making a difference. That’d all be fair. I’m not actually opposed to anyone getting work in the nonprofit industry. Well, okay, I am, but you know, we all make compromises. Do what you got to do and if the nonprofit world seems like it’s your thing then fine. Mainly though I want to just lay out some things, so you have your eyes open about the nonprofit industry more than I did when I was making a living and trying to make a life in it.

Back to making a living by making a difference, and having that be your life. Depending on where you work in the nonprofit industry, the job will be your life. Think about that for a minute. What’s involved in any job? A paycheck (the making a living part again). And that implies someone who signs the paycheck. A boss. If your life is your job, your boss has even more control over you than a regular boss who just controls your paycheck.

I had a job at one point, one of my jobs making a difference. We worked 50, 60, 70, 80 hours a week. I loved it. And I was good at it. I was really good at it actually. I’d been good at things before but this was the first thing I’d ever done where I felt like I had extra special talent. That made me love it even more. And I loved the people I was around. I loved the people I was working with - making a difference with, or making a difference for, maybe. I’ll come back to that, with and for. I loved my coworkers too. We were soldiers for the good fight - which is an addictive feeling, “I make a difference in a way that others only talk about, I’m important and special” - and everyone was smart, funny, well informed, left-leaning… the kind of people I like to be around. Which was lucky, because they were the only people I was ever around. The job became my whole life. So there was no room left in my life for anything else. I dropped off the face of the earth as far as a lot of my friends were concerned. And as far as my partner was concerned.

Eventually I stopped loving it so much. I got tired. Physically, because I wasn’t sleeping anywhere near enough. I developed insomnia around this time in a way I hadn’t really had before and which I still sometimes have. I didn’t have time to take care of myself. I gained some weight. My hair started thinning. I grew some white and grey chest hairs, got sick a lot. And I was emotionally tired. I missed my friends. I missed my partner, missed talking instead of being angry at each other or being sad about how we didn’t spend any time together. I also got tired of taking orders from the bosses. Not just orders about how long we worked and how hard, but orders about what we did and how. Sometimes I got orders I didn’t think were a good idea, and sometimes I had ideas that I thought we might try. So did my other co-workers. We were the ones going door to door talking to people, building relationships with people. We were the ones who cared about those people, not our bosses. To our bosses those people were just pawns. To us they were people we cared about and sometimes we had to fight for them against our bosses. We were also losing staff because no one could sustain the pace of our lifestyle. In about 10 months we had 23 staff come and go, which is not conducive to the long term struggle to make a difference.

In the face of that stuff, we decided to form a union. The boss fought us, and beat us. It was pretty shitty. They did most of the evil stuff in the union busting bible. In addition to all that, they took our people away from us. They swapped us around so we worked with different co-workers. They changed which doors we knocked on. They didn’t let us keep working with the people we had relationships with. All of that was really awful. It was my life and they took it away.

After that union drive ended, I ended up working another place with progressive values a few months later. The hours were better and the pay was worse. That also turned into a union drive which we also lost, though it worked better than the first time around.

The point is very simple here. Anywhere you make a living you will have a boss (unless you are a boss, in which case fuck off). Your boss has a large measure of control over how you make your living. If you make your life out of how you make your living, then you give your boss that much more control over you. Simple.

Of course, to some degree you can’t get over this. You’re alive while you’re at work. It’s like you will have co-workers and relationships with your co-workers. You may become quite close to your co-workers so that your co-workers become part of how you make your life. In that case, your boss has the same power of you, right? Yes and no.

It makes sense to try to make it so that making your living is part of how you make your life. Do that, by all means, and I hope you succeed. But there’s an important difference. On the one hand there’s trying to make a life while you’re making a living, during the same time, carving out life time during work time and trying to limit how work time impacts the rest of your life. On the other hand there’s making your life out of the way you make a living, making your life out of the how of your job, what you do. Of course these aren’t absolute distinctions, and it’s easy to slip from the first to the second. But it’s the second that really typifies making a living and a life in the nonprofit industry. And other places as well, like in the university for many people.

If you’re life is what you do for a living, as it is for many people in nonprofits, that’s the special power of the nonprofit boss. I’ve worked as an organizer sometimes, and I love it. It’s like a drug. It becomes who I am. It consumes me, it becomes my whole life and my whole world so that there’s no room for anyone else and if I can I will look for energy from others to plug into organizing. That’s what happened in the story I told before where I pretty much dropped out of some of my relationships. In that case, since I got paid for doing organizing, I was making my life out of the thing I got paid to do.

When I lost those jobs, I was no longer able to do that organizing. That part of how I make my life is taken from me. Of course, you could say “why didn’t you stay involved?” Well, in part because they took the information from me, I didn’t have all of it. In part because I didn’t want to involve the people I was organizing by telling them what was going on - I thought it would be a distraction from the issues I was organizing around, and a distraction at a critical time can really hurt someone - and if I had stuck around my boss would have told them, my boss was willing to hurt those people. Also, after losing those jobs I had to find other ones, which left a lot less time to plug into the old organizing in the way I was used to, on a full time basis and as someone on the outside somewhat, the position of the staff member.

I want to make one other comment, on the phrase “nonprofit organization.” First off, the nonprofits I worked at were all really disorganized. That’s true of the for profit joints I’ve worked too, though. The world’s a jumbled place and it seems miraculous that anything works at all sometimes. And “nonprofit” is a misleading term. Here’s how I understand profit. When you work someplace, your employer wants you to make more money - or make more of whatever it is you make, do more of whatever it is you do that can be exchanged for money - more money than it costs your employer to pay you. It’s simple really. If it costs a place more money to keep you on than the fire you, the odds are pretty good that you’ll be fired unless there’s something atypical going on (like the boss is your parent, or your blackmailing them or something).

The difference between the value of what you make for the place you work at and what you get paid, Marx called that difference surplus value. It’s like a profit that an employer gets out of employees. Surplus value is present in the nonprofit world too, and in that sense nonprofits aren’t nonprofit. Nonprofit employers operate according to the same principles as for profit employers. They tend to increase the hours of work and/or the intensity of work. They fight unionization attempts. They tend to fight anything that’s not exactly that they have in mind.

This is because the pay isn’t just monetary in nonprofits. That is, you get paid money as part of your making a living, but people in that industry tend to also make nonprofits a part of how they make a life, which is like saying people get paid in perks like a sense of satisfaction, a self image of one’s self as someone who makes a difference. If you rock the boat at a nonprofit then you’re threatening not just how your boss makes a living, as in any job, but also how your boss makes a life. And since the nonprofit workplace tends to appeal to higher values, they’ll appeal to those higher values against you, like when Bush invokes freedom to justify bombing and theft.

A lot of nonprofit bosses have put a ton of time into their work. I’ve worked under a lot of bosses who have absolutely no life outside of the job, outside of making a living in a nonprofit. They’ve given up a ton and as a result they’re tremendously protective of what they have. Since all they have is the job, that means they react in a big way to problems at work, including problems like employees expressing their needs. A lot of nonprofit bosses have Louis the 14th syndrome. King Louis said “I am the State!” as in, what’s good for him is good for France and vice versa. The president of General Motors once said “What’s good for General Motors is good for America,” which is a similar idea. Nonprofit bosses, especially in smaller social justice organizations, often have a hard time telling the difference between themselves and the organization. If there’s any criticism or disagreement of how things could be done differently around the organization, they take it as a personal attack. And they take whatever they want and need as being good for the organization, which means any personal disagreement with them is likely to be mapped onto - and fought about in terms of - conflict over the organization.

[doing for and doing with; how it’s not different anywhere else either; communists on the clock are acting against the clock not getting paid for being communists, more on my experiences?]

7 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2007/04/11/is-the-social-justice-industry/trackback/

  1. hey nate,

    totally brillant - exactly my thoughts on it (well, a more articulate version). I have tended to avoid working in anything i would concievably do anyway, which is where some of this comes from. It is seductive though, the idea of being paid for something you would concieve of doing anyway (community organising or media, writing, work place organising, or, in my case, media production). Now i tend to just aim for the highest income up until management (i may be a barsted, but im not a fucking barsted)(he he). but no, there are some jobs i wont do, cause i still belive that if you can make a minor difference, then you should try up until a certain point. It’s interesting how the art side of it comes into the creative industries - have you read Rosalind Gill’s ‘Technobohemians or the new Cybertariat?‘? It address this point perfectly - that the new industries rely on unpaid labour and the absolute identification of human create activity with labour, which i think is the point with NGO work as well - and, Marx’s as well. Though he doesnt do it very well, and obscures the social dimension of how labour and exchange are constructed, he does point out that labour appears as a commodity, and we can say that all of human activity tends towards subsumption under the commodity form, and hence all activity looks like work - even when we try to escape it and find someone else meaningful, we find ourselves falling into ‘meaningful work’. I do think its worth adding in some of Graber’s points about political struggle being struggle over the forms of life to be valued, and unwaged NGO style labour being about access to non-monetary ‘good’ capital, and how that creates a system where some people have access to non-monetary value, and others dont… (from the commoner). anyway, rant over.
    nic

    Comment by nic — April 11, 2007 @ 10:29 am

  2. Thans Niko! I don’t mean to say that all that stuff’s _worthless_ it’s just not a utopia and insofar as one’s trying to make clear decisions once we really look at NGO work etc it looks less desirable. If somebody goes into it clearheaded, fine and good. It’s a job, no worries, like any other. It’s not communism, though. I like your point, or maybe it’s Graber’s (I still need to read that), about distribution and access to nonmonetary values. All that aside, though, I’m with you about not taking management jobs. My empathy more or less maps onto the limits of the bargaining unit, so to speak.
    take care,
    Nate

    ps - u still in London?

    Comment by Nate — April 12, 2007 @ 2:08 am

  3. yup - still here, trying to learn how to spell in english and welsh so i can maintain the income. web editing sure beats reprographics. i keep meaning to write something up about the media production field here - its a large-ish sector (of sorts) that interfaces between the admin sector and the ‘creative industries’, except that the creative industries is equal parts stable-creatives, management, grunts like me and admin workers, and unwaged creatives (i.e, subcultures, design students, artists, etc). People like me are in an interesting sector - legal and bank work, plus most management work, can’t take place without the still-existing paper trail. so the photocopy kids in the banks are really crucial, as are the paralegal paper chasers, etc. it would be interesting to map out he admin/media production/paralegal space in this city.. if i ever get enough time to do it. but to bring it back to yr post, i was thinking how much work in the university is like NGO and media work - Gill’s piece is great on the media stuff - and how it requires a strong identification with the job. its like shit work requires a work ethic (working in general is good) whereas high-value work requires a carreer identification (being a lawer or intellectual is worthwhile and important). anyway, back to the welsh….

    sol,
    nic

    Comment by nic — April 12, 2007 @ 1:21 pm

  4. It seems I’m intruding into a conversation whose beginnings I missed, but the “Graber” article mentioned above sounds like David Greaber’s “Army of Altruists: On the Alienated Right to Do Good,” originally published in Harper’s but available online here:

    http://www.sleepykid.org/blog/2007/01/13/army-of-altruists/

    Great, great piece, in my estimation.

    At the bottom rungs of NGO work (namely, phone and door-to-door canvassing) it’s not uncommon to find oneself shamed and humiliated by hippie taskmasters who make working for Greenpeace feel like Glengarry Glen Ross, except your commission is a pittance. Super weird. I’m sure it varies, but the division of labor (and the status accrued, etc) in NGOs is often more exploitative and anti-labor, for the reasons outlined in this talk, than the for-profit “sector.”

    [Nate, sorry for dropping off the thread re: Badiou, parity, and Rise Against a while back… ]

    Comment by Andrew — April 13, 2007 @ 2:16 am

  5. hi Andrew,

    Thanks for that, I’ve just glanced at it but will read it properly later.

    Canvassing suuucks. The canvassing job I had, we were paid like 50 or 60 bucks a day as long as we hit quota. If we didn’t make enough, they’d pay minimum wage. There was a ton of unpaid hours (wage and hour violations) and if you failed to hit quota enough times then they canned you. Two of my coworkers were homeless and sleeping in a park sometimes, one of them got fired for not making quota. The bosses were all under 24, one as young as 18, paid by the hour but treated like salary and totally overworked, which helped make the treatment worse.

    On a related note, some other stuff related to a canvasser organizing drive that happened as part of the IWW a while back - http://www.iww.org/en/unions/iu650/acorn

    take care,
    n8

    [Don’t sweat the other thread, I understand life is hectic!]

    Comment by Nate — April 13, 2007 @ 4:29 am

  6. hey, just came accross this on a related note…

    A study out today shows that a career as a university academic pays less than almost every other graduate profession. Only secondary school teachers and further education lecturers fare worse.

    Comment by nic — April 13, 2007 @ 10:57 am

  7. Ah crap. I haven’t had any coffee yet Nic, fuck’s sake…

    It beats bagging groceries though. I guess.

    Comment by Nate — April 13, 2007 @ 3:36 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.