Update on this. I spoke with a family member today about the loved ones in detention. They’re still there, in part due to what appears to be incompetence on the part of the lawyers involved (for instance, failure to inform folks that there needs to be a statement made by someone on the outside saying that the loved ones can be released to the person on the outside, who will be legally responsible for them).
They’ve been in since just before xmas. That’s right around 65 days. The adult I think still has a job, fingers crossed. The kids’ school year is most fucked once they get out, they’ll be repeating this year unless they get really luck and can get away with summer school. The legal bills are approximately ten grand, possibly more.
They’re in a facility called Hutto, in Texas. The facility is described as a “humane alternative to maintain the unity of alien families.” Asked how the sleeping units have been changed since the place used to be a prison, director Gary Mead says “The paint is different, the rails are different, the carpet is different.” There you are, from the mouth of the beast itself, humane = cosmetic paint job.
I found a story indicating that not only deportees are being kept here but at least one family who were flying into Canada across the US and whose plane made an unscheduled stop in the US.
Hutto is one of two detention centers in the US that houses children with adults. That’s part of why our loved ones are there, instead of in the state where the pigs grabbed them - they wanted to stay together rather than be separated. The policy of detaining families is said to be “a response to the [Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency’s] decision in August to end its controversial practice of “catch and release,” in which migrants with children detained on U.S. soil were typically set free and told to show up later in court.”
According to this, the facility has had 21 grievances related to food. The relative I spoke to today said the food inside is reported to be so bad as to sometimes be inedible, resulting in de facto hunger strikes. The ICE has tried to push its humane paintjob in the press, but some guards have been more upfront about the situation, saying the “Hutto center was being sanitized, or “prettied up,” for [a recent] media tour, with furniture, artificial trees and other amenities appearing in the facility immediately prior to the tour.”
Hutto is operated by Corrections Corporation of America (also discussed here), scum who are the largest private prison company in the US (according note 39, here). According to this, CCA has been involved in privatized border maintenance since 1984. I found a list here of uglynesses which CCA is responsible for. Very much abridged, I’m sure. CCA also has a history of retaliating against detainees who talk to the press. Given the identity of the border management regime with the prison system, perhaps no border folk should join the Texas Prison Labor Union, and vice versa.
There are currently around 2.18 million people in prison in the US, about 1 in every 136 people, and around 200,000 people in immigration related detention, close to 10% of the prison population. Out of curiousity, anyone read this?
No conditions (Badiou-ian or otherwise) can be attached to demands against border policing (demands may also not be the right way to frame anti-border/free-mobility activity, either), as those conditions merely prefigure a new count. When one starts doing the police’s job for them, well, that’s just the cop in the head which must be dealt with as per Vaneigem’s advice, ie, ruthlessly.

Nate, thanks for the update. Sorry to hear that they are still in detention. When you first wrote about this, I wondered if they might be at Hutto (which is just north of Austin, about an hour’s drive from my house), what with DHS-ICE’s touching desire to keep families together.
As a couple of the articles you linked alluded to, there have been some criticisms and actions against the facility, and a couple of changes have been made, or have said to been made: the children now have a full school day, the food and “conditions” are supposed to be better. Unfortunately, a lot of the discourse about this has expressed outrage at the fact that children, and innocent children at that, are being kept there — in other words, the state’s right to keep people indefinitely detained has gone largely unquestioned. Only some of the details have been criticised. There has been some criticism also of the host county’s making a tidy profit from the venture, but even that, in Austin media, has been in the spirit of showing, yet again, what a barbaric place Williamson County/Round Rock, and how unlike Austin it is.
Anyway, some more links. Sorry they’re not coded.
http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A441523
http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A446978
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/02/10/10immigjail.html
http://www.statesman.com/search/content/news/stories/local/02/08/8immigjail.html
http://www.statesman.com/search/content/gen/ap/TX_Family_Detention_Center.html
Comment by Eric — February 19, 2007 @ 1:55 pm
Thanks Erik. I agree about the whole “think of the children” thing. I mean, the youth of two of our folks in Hutto does make this extra upsetting, but the implied “if they just let the kids out it’d be okay” thing in the child related outrage is fucked.
With the folks we know in there, it is better that they be in this place together than that they be split up. It may even be better that kids be inside with their parent than outside with the parent(s) in lock up, in some cases, but our responses shouldn’t be reduced to that kind of quibbling between those sorts of options - granted a choice of only this move or that move, we’ll make whatever is most expedient in the short term and in the long term keep planning for the gameboard to kicked off the table. The liberal concession of the game (and protests against this or that move which still imply the board’s legitimacy) absolutely can’t be conceded, in my opinion. That’s the lie of ‘humane’ - it elects what is claimed as the best option in a way which obfuscates the existence of other options.
One rhetorical response I have (I use it as a sort of shibboleth) on the rare occasions I get into conversation about this is that any operation like this is going to exceed its mandate, catching up some who are not its designated targets (locking up ‘innocent’ along with ‘guilty’). If one really finds that exceeding problematic then the operation should be scrapped, obviously. If one finds the operation is worth the exceeding, then the conversation ends uncomfortably.
take care,
Nate
Comment by Nate — February 19, 2007 @ 2:58 pm
Well stated. I like the image of a game, especially kicking it off the table, as in someone’s precarious, unreproducible arrangement of domination in the game Risk.
Comment by Eric — February 20, 2007 @ 1:51 pm