<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230; did they see, exactly?</title>
	<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/</link>
	<description>A working notebook</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-1002</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-1002</guid>
					<description>Hi Nate--

Very rarely.  We link to the site at C&amp;amp;S but I rarely look in.  I'm on the AutOpSy list or whatever it is, but again a lot of the news there is only of passing interest to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Nate&#8211;</p>
	<p>Very rarely.  We link to the site at C&amp;S but I rarely look in.  I&#8217;m on the AutOpSy list or whatever it is, but again a lot of the news there is only of passing interest to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-1001</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:04:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-1001</guid>
					<description>John, thanks for that. More soon-ish, when I get caught up on some stuff. Random question - are you on libcom?
cheers,
n8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John, thanks for that. More soon-ish, when I get caught up on some stuff. Random question - are you on libcom?<br />
cheers,<br />
n8
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-1000</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:03:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-1000</guid>
					<description>And My bad, not Ny bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And My bad, not Ny bad!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-999</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:02:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-999</guid>
					<description>Ny bad.  That should of course be Solidarity Federation, or SolFed, not Solidarity Network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ny bad.  That should of course be Solidarity Federation, or SolFed, not Solidarity Network.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-998</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:26:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-998</guid>
					<description>Hi Nate--

I may be wrong but I assume the &quot;Direct Action&quot; mentioned here is the British anarcho-syndicalist organization that preceded the Solidarity Network.  Its full name was the Direct Action Movement, or DAM.  I knew a few of their members in Manchester in the 1980s, and Jordi, one of my fellow bloggers at C&amp;amp;S, was a member (He may well still be a member of its offspring organization, if it's still going, although he's back in Barcelona now and active in the CNT).

The Brinton book is worth getting hold of.  I reviewed it, tangentially, &lt;a href=&quot;http://counago-and-spaves.blogspot.com/2005/05/parerga-and-paralipomena_19.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and there's another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=1170&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; at Anarkismo.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Nate&#8211;</p>
	<p>I may be wrong but I assume the &#8220;Direct Action&#8221; mentioned here is the British anarcho-syndicalist organization that preceded the Solidarity Network.  Its full name was the Direct Action Movement, or DAM.  I knew a few of their members in Manchester in the 1980s, and Jordi, one of my fellow bloggers at C&amp;S, was a member (He may well still be a member of its offspring organization, if it&#8217;s still going, although he&#8217;s back in Barcelona now and active in the CNT).</p>
	<p>The Brinton book is worth getting hold of.  I reviewed it, tangentially, <a href="http://counago-and-spaves.blogspot.com/2005/05/parerga-and-paralipomena_19.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> and there&#8217;s another <a href="http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=1170" rel="nofollow">here</a> at Anarkismo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-997</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:33:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-997</guid>
					<description>another Solidarity archive, repeats some of what's on libcom but has more http://www.af-north.org/solidarity/solidarity.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>another Solidarity archive, repeats some of what&#8217;s on libcom but has more <a href='http://www.af-north.org/solidarity/solidarity.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.af-north.org/solidarity/solidarity.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-996</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:13:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-996</guid>
					<description>Thanks Craig. Very interesting. I don't know anything about this group Direct Action, and it's interesting to hear the organizational criticism of Solidarity. I've seen very little on what the group did, I've just read some of their pamphlets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks Craig. Very interesting. I don&#8217;t know anything about this group Direct Action, and it&#8217;s interesting to hear the organizational criticism of Solidarity. I&#8217;ve seen very little on what the group did, I&#8217;ve just read some of their pamphlets.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-995</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:37:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-995</guid>
					<description>From the book I mentioned in email to you:

&quot;At that time, along with Anthony Woodiwiss and others, I was involved in the Socialist groups Direct Action and Solidarity. Both groups were libertarian, that is to say that their understanding of socialist politics was that it involved a prefigurative liberatory practice. Oppressions needed to be identified in their specificity, fought in a participatory democratic grassroots manner both outside and inside the movement. Struggles involving class, race, minority groups such as Romany travellers, gender, sexual orientaion, were all supported. At the time I read Durkheim reasonably carefully but engaged in what Althusser called a 'dogmatic reading'. A few years later, I became increasingly dissatisfied with left Weberian sociology and disillusioned with Solidarity's post-Marxist theory (grounded in the writings of Claude Lefort, Cornelius Castoriadis, Jean-Francois Lyotard, all members of Solidarity's sister organisation Socialisme ou barberie), and by its failure to develop a democratic structure and, not unrelatedly, its inability to develop a strategic theory of practice.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>From the book I mentioned in email to you:</p>
	<p>&#8220;At that time, along with Anthony Woodiwiss and others, I was involved in the Socialist groups Direct Action and Solidarity. Both groups were libertarian, that is to say that their understanding of socialist politics was that it involved a prefigurative liberatory practice. Oppressions needed to be identified in their specificity, fought in a participatory democratic grassroots manner both outside and inside the movement. Struggles involving class, race, minority groups such as Romany travellers, gender, sexual orientaion, were all supported. At the time I read Durkheim reasonably carefully but engaged in what Althusser called a &#8216;dogmatic reading&#8217;. A few years later, I became increasingly dissatisfied with left Weberian sociology and disillusioned with Solidarity&#8217;s post-Marxist theory (grounded in the writings of Claude Lefort, Cornelius Castoriadis, Jean-Francois Lyotard, all members of Solidarity&#8217;s sister organisation Socialisme ou barberie), and by its failure to develop a democratic structure and, not unrelatedly, its inability to develop a strategic theory of practice.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-994</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:01:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-994</guid>
					<description>hi Craig,
No it doesn't. There was a collection of stuff published recently by Maurice Brinton - 
http://www.akpress.org/2004/items/forworkerspower - I believe these texts are included in that collection but I'm not totally sure. 
take care,
Nate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>hi Craig,<br />
No it doesn&#8217;t. There was a collection of stuff published recently by Maurice Brinton -<br />
<a href='http://www.akpress.org/2004/items/forworkerspower' rel='nofollow'>http://www.akpress.org/2004/items/forworkerspower</a> - I believe these texts are included in that collection but I&#8217;m not totally sure.<br />
take care,<br />
Nate
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-993</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:27:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/10/24/did-they-see-exactly/#comment-993</guid>
					<description>Does it give the names of those who wrote the pamphlet beyond the corporate author? A number of them ended up in Canada - well, at least two of them - and one of them is a friend of mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Does it give the names of those who wrote the pamphlet beyond the corporate author? A number of them ended up in Canada - well, at least two of them - and one of them is a friend of mine.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
