<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230; are these quotes for?</title>
	<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/09/19/are-these-quotes-for/</link>
	<description>A working notebook</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: bitacle.org</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/09/19/are-these-quotes-for/#comment-924</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:46:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/09/19/are-these-quotes-for/#comment-924</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bitacle Blog Search Archive - &lt;/strong&gt;

[...] 	I have previously argued that the permanence of simple circulation within capitalism means that the capital relation as such is biopolitical in the sense which Hardt and Negri give the term. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Bitacle Blog Search Archive - </strong></p>
	<p>[&#8230;] 	I have previously argued that the permanence of simple circulation within capitalism means that the capital relation as such is biopolitical in the sense which Hardt and Negri give the term. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
