<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damned Lies&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/</link>
	<description>A working notebook</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: P. Ensminger</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-1786</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:20:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-1786</guid>
					<description>Celeste Mattina is NOT a representative of Starbucks Coffee she is the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board. Just as an FYI.
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Press%20Releases/2000/r2396.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Celeste Mattina is NOT a representative of Starbucks Coffee she is the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board. Just as an FYI.<br />
<a href='http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Press%20Releases/2000/r2396.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Press%20Releases/2000/r2396.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-931</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:21:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-931</guid>
					<description>You wanna post your response? Put it in a comment. What I found particularly funny, can't remember if I commented on this already, was the quote mark at the end. Gives the lie to the veneer of personalized response, since the piece has been copied from some other source. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You wanna post your response? Put it in a comment. What I found particularly funny, can&#8217;t remember if I commented on this already, was the quote mark at the end. Gives the lie to the veneer of personalized response, since the piece has been copied from some other source.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-928</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:39:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-928</guid>
					<description>I got the exact same letter and wrote a similarly enjoyable response. Sadly, I haven't heard back from them since then. I guess they figured that corresponding with me was a waste of time. Alas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I got the exact same letter and wrote a similarly enjoyable response. Sadly, I haven&#8217;t heard back from them since then. I guess they figured that corresponding with me was a waste of time. Alas&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: N.Stein</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-910</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:02:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-910</guid>
					<description>We linked to this blog post from an article about the IWW effort to organize Starbucks in Chicago. The form letter you got seems to be about par for the course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We linked to this blog post from an article about the IWW effort to organize Starbucks in Chicago. The form letter you got seems to be about par for the course.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thys</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-906</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/damned-lies/#comment-906</guid>
					<description>they may be lying, but you have to thank them for this great  letter... newspeak or doublespeak, very Orwellian. refusing to use the word ´worker´ or even ´employee´ and all that. But isn´t it true that workers are partners? we do (re)produce and valorize capital, after all. You (as union organizers) could turn this against them in a polemical way, if you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>they may be lying, but you have to thank them for this great  letter&#8230; newspeak or doublespeak, very Orwellian. refusing to use the word ´worker´ or even ´employee´ and all that. But isn´t it true that workers are partners? we do (re)produce and valorize capital, after all. You (as union organizers) could turn this against them in a polemical way, if you want.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
