<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230; was Gauche Proletarienne?</title>
	<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/04/14/was-gauche-proletarienne/</link>
	<description>A working notebook</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mark</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/04/14/was-gauche-proletarienne/#comment-599</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 08:15:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/04/14/was-gauche-proletarienne/#comment-599</guid>
					<description>The best source is Belden Fields, who yo uare apparently aware of. Defert said that thing in a talk in London in 2004, so you can't look it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The best source is Belden Fields, who yo uare apparently aware of. Defert said that thing in a talk in London in 2004, so you can&#8217;t look it up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/04/14/was-gauche-proletarienne/#comment-597</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:26:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/04/14/was-gauche-proletarienne/#comment-597</guid>
					<description>Thanks very much Mark. Can you recommend more sources on all this? Where does Defert say that about Foucault and inserting the I between G and P? That's interesting stuff. 
best,
Nate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks very much Mark. Can you recommend more sources on all this? Where does Defert say that about Foucault and inserting the I between G and P? That&#8217;s interesting stuff.<br />
best,<br />
Nate
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mark</title>
		<link>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/04/14/was-gauche-proletarienne/#comment-595</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:59:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatinthehell.blogsome.com/2006/04/14/was-gauche-proletarienne/#comment-595</guid>
					<description>The thing you cite for the Defert (note correct sp.!) is a dump of the Wikipedia article which I have had a large hand in- certainly this info is from me. Fields' book, which you cite, is surely the best source in English.

Sartre's involvement in the GP happened because the GP was banned - in common with a swathe of leftist groups post-68, including some Trots - resulting in over a 1,000 GPers being imprisoned on purely political grounds. Hence Defert's involvement, as a GPer on the outside, in prison solidarity shit - with so many GPers inside, the GP understandably became oriented towards prison work. Initially it was around trying to get political status for their prisoners and have them segregated from the general population, but then they shifted to trying to radicalise the prison population and do things on behalf of all prisoners, which is when Foucault and Deleuze and the GIP happened. Defert says, btw, that Foucault chose the GIP acronym to signify the intercession of the intellectuals in the GP. OK, so Sartre was involved because the De Gaulle refused to allow him to be imprisoned under the rubric &quot;one does not imprison Voltaire&quot;, so by becoming titular editor of Cause de Peuple, Sartre gave some kind of cover to its, otherwise illegal, publication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The thing you cite for the Defert (note correct sp.!) is a dump of the Wikipedia article which I have had a large hand in- certainly this info is from me. Fields&#8217; book, which you cite, is surely the best source in English.</p>
	<p>Sartre&#8217;s involvement in the GP happened because the GP was banned - in common with a swathe of leftist groups post-68, including some Trots - resulting in over a 1,000 GPers being imprisoned on purely political grounds. Hence Defert&#8217;s involvement, as a GPer on the outside, in prison solidarity shit - with so many GPers inside, the GP understandably became oriented towards prison work. Initially it was around trying to get political status for their prisoners and have them segregated from the general population, but then they shifted to trying to radicalise the prison population and do things on behalf of all prisoners, which is when Foucault and Deleuze and the GIP happened. Defert says, btw, that Foucault chose the GIP acronym to signify the intercession of the intellectuals in the GP. OK, so Sartre was involved because the De Gaulle refused to allow him to be imprisoned under the rubric &#8220;one does not imprison Voltaire&#8221;, so by becoming titular editor of Cause de Peuple, Sartre gave some kind of cover to its, otherwise illegal, publication.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
