Angela brought up the idea of visceral hatred for bosses, as something I’d said before.
I do have a deep-seated hate for bosses. My partner and I got into a big argument once about a friend who works in management. Our friend once was telling us about difficulties with having to discipline people for coming to work late. I changed the subject. Later, discussing this with my partner, I said that while I do care about my friend and sympathize to some extent with being in a difficult situation, my emotional response is much more than just that. Basically, my gut reaction is simply “you’re a fucking boss!” Ugh. My partner thought this was callous of me, that I didn’t recognize the rock and hard place between which my friend was constrained to act. I made a remark about a parallel difficulty faced by Nazis and prison guards, which went over with predictable lack of useful effect. I claimed it was because my partner has had less bad working experiences, beyond the general badness of having to work. Having been fucked with by many a boss, I do see things as simply a matter of don’t be a boss. Throughout the conversation, my partner kept demanding to know what our friend should have done in that situation. I have no idea, and neither did my partner. To put it in terms of a fairly basic criticism of Kantian morality, the injunction to act in a way such that the maxim of one’s action can be universalized is of limited efficacy when one is faced only with choice which are at best problematically universalizable. (If memory serves, we sat rather uncomfortably in the space of our disagreement for a while before soothing it with ice cream.) The injunction seems primarily to come down to a command not to get oneself into such positions where there aren’t actions available with universalizable maxims, which doesn’t help much when one is already in that situation. And yet, all suspicions of universals aside: Don’t be a boss (of which a fairly basic definition is someone with the power to hire and fire other people).
Part of my own response to bosses is conditioned by fear. I routinely lose sleep over financial worries, partly derived from some former bad work situations, the after-effects of which are only just beginning to disappear. In the US, a boss can fire an employee for any reason whatsoever, or for no reason at all. I am perpetually one paycheck from a humiliating phone call to my parents, two or three paychecks from repossessions and evictions. The boss has a lot of power to fuck up my life, in a totally unaccountable fashion.
Do I really hate the boss, though? Kind of. My stomach does always jump in one-on-one contact with bosses when the boss-ness is underscored. And yet, I don’t hate the person as such. There are some people I can think of, some of them former bosses who willfully and happily brought the hammer down, who I genuinely do wish cancer or other fatal illnesses on, but for the most part I don’t hate the person who is the boss. I hate being bossed.
On the other hand, there is a visceral thrill of standing up to the boss. In the US the law allows a freedom to concerted activity. Of course, the law is shit and many people get run over roughshod by bosses and the law is useless here. But the important point is that concerted activity is the potential for power - for intellectual power in planning and strategizing, emotional power in drawing people out to express their anger and desperation and their need for something better, for work stopping power in carrying out actions, and for another type of emotional power in the relationships that can be built in this setting. When we delivered our petition demanding union recognition my viscera were in knots and my palms were sweating. The ten of us thought we’d be fired on the spot (it took three months instead). At the same time, while it was terrifying it was thrilling too, and there was a lot of power in going up the elevator together. Small contacts - jostling elbows, a pat on the shoulder - carried a big charge. I’m tempted to say it was sublime - an experience of relative danger followed by relative safety.
In my experiences with workplace organizing I’ve found roleplaying can be very valuable to practice some of what goes on in confrontations, something analogous to practicing blocking a punch in self-defence classes, a way to train the body and mind to respond. We did one of these in a campaign where someone was having pay held back illegally after quitting a job. The training doesn’t change the experience, though, it (hopefully) impacts the outcome: it’s still scary to deal with the boss, because one is deliberately facing someone with the power to rewrite social lines at least at a micro level (”I’ll have security walk you out of the building”) in a way that can have a huge impact on one’s life.
At the same time, this facing up also draws (and draws upon a prior process of drawing) other lines, not lines around people but lines between and through people, lines of power not in the sense of in-group/out-group, power to push people out, but power to tug, power in the sense in which loved ones have power over each other: my younger brothers have a visceral power in relation to me, their experiences impact me tremendously such that sometimes I feel forced to act, even if sometimes I can’t actually do anything (not pushed into or out of, but pulled on by a line connecting us: when he was in second grade the older of my two younger brothers had an older kid on the schoolbus throw a pencil in his eye, calling him a camel jockey - his enthusiastic participation in the fervor of the first Gulf War - it didn’t matter that my brother is Mexican, not Arab, brown is brown I guess. I still get a hollow feeling in my stomach and have revenge fantasies when I think about it, and it’s well over a decade ago.) This is a force acting on me at bodily level.
Visceral hate for bosses is acted upon effectively (and fed affectively) by visceral care for comrades (and visceral grief over the slaps comrades take feeds hate for the ones who deliver them, and acting to slap the boss back feeds relationships of care)…

I have a similar reaction to bosses, Nate. Before working in the federal public service in the late eighties, it was more of an insufferance for authority in general (as I have been reminded over the past week, in discovering some of my old school reports) - probably because my experience of paid work was fairly limited (mostly as a university tutor, with quite a lot of job autonomy, at least back then). I do remember just before I started work in the government job, saying to a couple of close friends who were union delegates in the department for which I was headed, ‘I can’t see myself coming to hate managers like you do - capital is a social relation, they are just its bearers, blah blah blah’. ‘You’ll learn’, Cate and Paul said, and funnily enough they were right. A year later I was also a union delegate, doing my best to worsen my section manager’s ulcer. I think what shocked me the most - and brought me around to my friends’ point of view - was precisely the being ‘bossed around’ that you mentioned. Ursula Huws once talked about management treating workers as infants, and that was certainly my experience for much of the time there. Not that much of this was at the hands of the section manager - I had one great run in with him, but mostly he stayed in his office - but rather of some of the lower level supervisors. One of the sweetest moments then was when a supervisor who had bullied a whole group of us mercilessly for weeks, suddenly became quite frightened for her own position, and changed into a pussycat almost overnight (even baked us brownies once!). But that was in an ‘exceptional’ moment - and in fact virtually all the positions in the section were wiped out, due to a change in work procedures (although the majority of people were redeployed rather than sacked).
The scary thing about seeing workplace power relations in terms of treating others as infants is that I’m not sure my parenting style is any better at times …
Comment by Steve — September 11, 2005 @ 11:56 am
hi Steve,
Welcome. I’d fix you coffee if I could figure out how to send that to you (are christian scientists allowed to drink coffee?) electronically.
I have a similar reaction to landlords, actually, but it’s a little different there - for the most part I just have to pay my rent on time and things will work out (the same goes for airport security, those people give me the creeps!). The idea implied in my normal emotional response is “these powerful people are out to get me”, which is not actually the case. It’s more like they are indifferent to me as long as I stay within proscribed bounds (though those bounds can change - work restructuring, decision to sell the building for condominiums, new profiling rules for passengers etc), unless they are a capricious sadist. I’ve had run ins with the latter as most of us have, but that’s not the real problem with bosses, that some of them are sadists.
Most of the jobs I’ve had in my adult life have been in ‘nonprofit social justice campaign’ groups (calls to mind Castoriadis’s quip - “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, four words, four lies”), where there’s a weird sort of “we’re all in it together” mentality deployed by management (and to some degree believed in by management), in which managers try to be friendly and cool with the employees. This is probably no different than anywhere else in some ways - an attempt to pin shopfloor problems on employees (”I’m cool with everyone, it’s that guy’s attitude problem/laziness/lack of dedication to the cause/etc that’s the problem”). In some of the place I’ve worked this “we’re doing it for the people” (kind of like the “we’re doing it for the kids” thing in some sectors of [sub]cultural production) idea gets in the way of workplace organizing, because co-workers believe it enough to doubt themselves, and end up discussing “what will it do for/to the campaign” if workplace action is undertaken, instead of organizing and planning well.
As for parenting, I intend to be a deeply authoritarian parent.
The difference, though, is that my kids won’t face the threat of firing and so on - management’s disrespect wouldn’t be as big of a deal if they didn’t have such power of reprisal against people who don’t like that treatment. Then they’d just be assholes and the rest of us could organize ourselves to gang up on them. Actually, that’s sort of the plan anyway…
take care,
Nate
ps- you mentioned something a while back about some workplace restructuring at your current employ, any news on that?
Comment by Nate — September 11, 2005 @ 5:10 pm
My mum, who is a very diehard CS, won’t drink coffee - but no, it’s not grounds for ex-communication, unlike tobacco or alcohol. Anyway, I’m a tea snob, as ange and az could probably attest (my overwhelming favourite is Madura premium blend - maybe I should send you some).
Things are very fragmented where I work, unfortunately. The admin staff are being ’sorted’ at present, and then it will be the turn of the academics. And the rationalisation of units will have flow on effects for staffing, no doubt. Two people came to see me independently last week and say they were intending to take voluntary redundancy packages, and quite a few others are also voting with their feet in various ways …
Comment by Steve — September 13, 2005 @ 12:11 pm